|
|
January 31st |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
COMPETITION DAY!
We picked up the robot in the morning and had a close
to perfect run in our second round. However, due to
a loose peg one of our blocking carts fell as we hit
the ridge.
In the evening, in the third round we had a dream run.
The crowd reaction was awesome and it was nice to see
our robot work the way it was supposed to in front of
the audience! :)
Unfortunately, luck wasn't with us. In the fourth round
we did get two balls in and mounted the ridge but couldn't
travel the ridge. We were perplexed by this, and found
out a while later that the new paint on the board had
thickened the ridge and our robot was now getting stuck
on the ridge. Luckily the other robot failed and we
still won he match - but we were worried now...
We asked the organizers to run us on the table we knew
we worked on because of the table configuration changing,
and while we did run on that table in the next round
we ran on the other side - and as luck would have it
that side also had the paint problem! So again we couldn't
travel the ridge and ended up losing that round. So,
that was the end of our run in the competition.
However, we had a pleasant surprise waiting for us
when the organizers picked our robot for the "organizers
favorite award"! It was a gag gift in the form of a
huge KFC Bucket with a 5 dollar gift certificate in
it :) But we were content.
All in all we are happy :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today we just kept running our
robot all day long. Until impounding thats all we did.
And we had perfect runs most of the time, and the only
imperfections involved being unable to block our own
goal. We also did all the admin stuff in the afternoon,
prepared the second battery. Performed code review and
made minor changes in our caliberation code and just
ran it.
When impounding came, we were pretty confident we had
done a good job and it would run as long as no more
wierd things happened!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
We got into lab very early today!
A good nights rest helped us.
We spent the whole morning testing out different positions
for our breakbeam sensors and also doing some ultra
paranoid shielding of our sensors. Our final version
for this was approved by Jan and so eventough we still
failed when we shone a lamp ultra close to the bot -
we moved on.
We added in our error correction code today. Basically
we found different cases where we could fail and wrote
code that could possibly work in fixing the problems.
All the runs we had that day were always good in the
sense that we deployed. But we were worried by the fact
that we saw the error correction code coming into play
too often. However, We did get to see the error correction
code actually working and that probably positive.
We re-caliberated turns and tried to make our straights
go straight. But, we were having wierd issues with both
of these and ultimately decided that any corrections
we made didn't fix things sufficiently and stuck with
out old configurations.
Tommorrow is IMPOUNDING day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 27th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
In the morning we ran a few runs
and felt we were running on the ridge fine. Thereafter
we were concerned about lining up properly on the board
center so that we could deploy our blocking cart effectively.
We also added a timeout for the case where we might
have had problems picking up the first ball. And thereafter
we added in code to detect if we were in danger of being
too close to the wall when hitting the ridge, and make
a correction for it.
We started trying to use the plexiglass in the center
to align ourselves. But we couldn't align ourselves
properly. However, we did deploy once and had a perfect
run. Neil B. saw it and so did a few other teams. Neil
B. was quite impressed by it and told us that the other
teams were worried.
Finally, we tried putting on some masking tape on the
castor to reduce the friction coefficient. We lined
up a lot better now. But we still had a few failures
in deployment. So, we changed the carts and made them
smaller. Sean was trying to figure out how the small
carts could block balls, but then Steve realised that
the chutes wouldn't take in the carts so we could effective
block the chutes and that was good enough for us!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 26th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
We spent the entire day working
on runnign on the ridge. We kept fine tuning the part
on our robot that actually caught and rode the ridge
- a lot of effort was put in controlling the friction
exerted on the robot. We also noticed that the bad runs
last night might be caused by the board being somewhat
slanted against us and also due to our motors stalling
for too long and overheating the control chips.
Later in the night, we took part in the mock competition.
We got two balls in, but lost because the other robot
was fortunate to accidently get a ball in our goal.
Ofcourse we couldn't block anything yet since we didn't
have code to perform that function.
We spent the post "Mock Competition" time working on
the ridge trying to fix it up more. We also wrote in
the symmetric code for running the white side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janaury 25th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today assignment 4 was due. So we
worked on writing up code and testing our robot to work
in such a manner that we could show that we could score
points during a game - this was the requirement for
assignment 4.
We spent much of the day perfecting our two ball pickup
and orientation code and managed to convince Manu that
it worked that night - we were one of the few teams
to qualify with more than one ball being scored!
Thereafter, we went on caliberating our robot and fine
tuned our straight runs. We changed the shaft encoding
somewhat. We also added "ski's" on the front of the
robot so it could glide on the ridge effectively. We
also started adding code to run on the ridge on the
black side. We noticed that the ridge runs were slow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
The sensors were mounted today.
We also started caliberating turns - and we noticed
that our rubber bands kept coming off. We tried hot
gluing the rubber bands but it didn't work all that
great.
Figuring we couldn't do rubber bands, we decided to
try tyres on the robot - Sean had to re-change our robot
structure to accomodate the tyres.
That night after putting in the tyres we re-caliberated
turns for the tyres.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 23rd |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Today when we came into lab we
had rebuilt the entire front portion of our robot which
held the tether. However, upon making a few runs we
realised that the robot structure was weak against hitting
the ridge and that we had lego pegs coming out on impact.
So, we rebuilt the structure again and made it stronger
- this involved redoing the work we had done the night
before in building our tether holder and cart holders.
We were finally happy with the structure we had - and
it had noticeably less flex in it. We also made a cable
for the break beam sensors and tested them. Initially
we thought there was a problem with one of the ports
used for shaft encoding. But discovered that it was
a peculiarity of the HandyBoard and if we restarted
IC we would work fine.
We also wired and prepared all our sensors for mounting
today. However, we didn't go ahead and mount them yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 22nd |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Ooops! We went into the 001 lab
and it didn't work! So, our release mechanism failed
during testing on the board. We found out that the release
mechanism is actually quite sensitive: both to board
alignment and the angle. The actual release worked but
the deployment was flawed and we didn't block the two
goals consistently.
We spent the entire day, deploying and re-deploying
looking for the flaws in our design and little by little
managed to improve it until we were convinced we could
make this part of our robot work.
Deciding we needed a break, we left lab early and went
out to watch "Black Hawk Down".
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 21st |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today is Martin Luther King day
and therefore the labs were closed. Steve's room was
our workspace and Sean did a great deal of improvements
on our bracings. We also worked on the cart holders
and release mechanisms. We had to use a rubber band
to implement our release mechanism. The gearbox just
couldn't handle the force exerted by the carts. Tomorrow
we're gonna check it out in lab - hope it works.. hope
it works!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 20th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
We went into lab again today.
Found out that our robot's weight wasn't balanced quite
right to do ridge following. Essentially the robot's
wheels kept slipping at alarming rates as it tried to
ride the ridge. Sice this wasn't too good for our strategy
we set out to to find and fix the problem.
The problem occurred due to the weight not being sufficiently
high on the portion outside the trough. This meant that
the wheels weren't being forced on to the board and
so had the opportunity to slip. We decided the best
way to counter this was to add more weight on the wheel
and did so by mounting a battery cells each on the wheel
areas. Thereafter we went on to mount the handy board
and the other battery in a manner we felt was most efficient.
It helped us lower our center of gravity and reduce
the likelihood of tipping over as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 19th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Today was a very productive and
ego boosting day. After finally waking up and getting
to work around noon. We managed to build a mirror image
of our new wheel/gearbox design and mount the new driving
mechanisms on.
Then we headed into lab. Firstly, we found we had really
good speed now. Secondly, our ridge following worked
really well since we had the torque needed to get over
the initial static friction.
Then we tested it on catching the ridge and riding
it. Both worked well. Finally, we placed the balls as
they would be in the ideal situation when we had picked
up one ball and were going to know over the other. We
ran the robot such that it would put both those balls
in the chute and race along the ridge towards the center.
It WORKED! So, we're psyched. But we still need to
figure out how to get the second ball inside the robot.
Sean's thining about it tonight... hope he comes up
with something good!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 18th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
So its the big day. We went into
lab and tested out the basic robot we had. It has most
of our critical functionality in it so we were excited.
Unfortunately we didn't see the kind of speeds we were
envisioning. However, we did go on to put in some sensors
and satisfy Manu that we had met the requirements for
Assignment 3 - we had our robot drive up to a wall,
detect collision with it, back up and make a turn.
However, during our own testing we had problems with
speed and ridge following which are critical to our
strategy. After much discussion we decided to try and
mount a second motor and reduce the number of gears
we have.
We spent most of the evening at Steve's place working
on new gearboxes. After much playing around we finally
go tsomething we liked. A gearbox with 2 motors and
a 1:27 ratio with fewer gears than we had before. It
seemed to run smooth so we hoped it would work well.
We worked so late, we had to get to IHOP to find food!
So, now we're looking forward to getting the new design
working tomorrow!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 17th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today we spent the time focusing
on building good gear boxes at a 27:1 ratio. After fiddling
around most of the day we built one that seemed good.
Steve also managed to mount our Servos in a stable manner.
Tomorrow we'll test it out in lab and also do the needful
to complete assignment 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 16th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Today, Steve and Sean spoke to
the TA's and discussed the legalities of cutting up
the base plate so that we could use it as a tether for
our "blocking carts". After receiving their blessing
they went ahead and cut up the board. They also drilled
hole so now we can connect up the pieces to make a tether
using the gray pegs. The tethers seem to work much better
than the ones we had previously using LEGO beams. We
spend the evening working on a 1:27 gear box that would
fit the dimensions we wanted and still ran smoothly.
Tomorrow we'll put those gearboxes in with the wheels
and mount the servos to get the complete base of our
robot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 15th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today we devoted our entire time
to prototyping different gearboxes and gear ratios.
We ran the test-bots on Steve's kitchen floor and had
great fun measuring the distance they covered in 2 seconds.
As expected we found a rise in this distance as we increased
the gear ratio and then a decrease. We selected the
peak in this trend:27 to be our gear ratio. We also
built a prototype "release" mechanism for the blocking
carts. Seems workable using a motor and making it stall.
Dunno if thats such a great idea. But the prototype
does achieve the task we envisioned. We, now have 3
days to use the knowledge we came up with in the last
two days to build our robot sufficiently far that we
can meet the third assignment requirements on Friday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 14th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today we got down to some "real"
work. We built a prototype for the "Cart" that we wanted
to use to block the chutes. Our initial prototypes and
tests on this proved promising. Next, Sean built a base
on which to do some Gearbox testing so we could find
an optimal ratio. These two activities took up most
of our time. We also made a trip to the lab to test
the feasibility of "ridge following": where we would
move across the board to its center by following the
ridge. Riding off the board completely and catching
the ridge while doing so proved to be a highly reliable
excercise. Our new strategy is looking promising!
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 12th and 13th
|
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
We didn't work much this weekend.
Decided to "take a break". The wisdom of that decision
will be apparent in the days to come. However, we did
meet up a few times briefly and took those opportunities
to discuss some ideas we had come up with on our own.
We want to do some prototyping of these ideas to test
their feasibility on Monday and Tuesday.
Meanwhile, we seem like we are set on the strategy
of getting 2 balls, then running to the middle to release
blocking carts.
We suspect that many other teams might also have the
same strategy but hopefully we can carry out our strategy
much faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 11th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Our final lecture was today.
More info on sensors and coding tips. Was useful, although
the coding part wasn't really new. The sensors actually
seem useful AND reliable. We also attended the workshop
on gear boxes and motor mounting. So now we can "legoize"
motors. We went into lab and "legoized" our motors and
picked up the distance sensor - now this is a cool piece
of hardware. Also, we tested out a prototype for an
idea involving releasing two carts in the trought to
fall through and block the two scoring chutes. The tests
were promising and we decided to incorporate it into
our evoling strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 10th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Today we first went for the 3rd
workshop which was titled "Code 1: Basic Control and
Robot Skills". The excercise they had set up for us
involved writing code to make a pre built robot perform
line following. Mr.C(han) who was still quite hot on
the C skills after 824 made short work of that. Our
code worked pretty well and we were done quite quickly.
Did help us understand the merits and applications of
different censors. Afterwards we went and typed up our
strategy in preperation for the meeting with Manu and
the 2 Neils. We met with Manu and the two Neils in the
evening and went on to explain our strategy. They were
OK with it, although it was obvious our strategy wasn't
exceptional in any way. (Essentially we were gonna pick
up two balls and then follow the other robot trying
to block it). Niel B. had some great tips the actual
mechanics for the robot. Manu was also very helpful
with the strategy and Neil S. also had some useful insights.
With the feedback we got in mind, we headed back to
discuss our plans further. It became obvious that our
strategy would evolve but we felt we had started off
well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 9th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Today we had our second lecture.
We're pretty comfortable with the game itself now, and
our ideas seem to focus on using both the board and
the rules to our advantage. Some pretty whack ideas
are being thrown around. We learnt about how to use
the Handyboard and a brief overview of the API we needed
to control our robot. We also seem to be converging
on a strategy which we like. We need to present it tomorrow
to Manu and the two Niels (our Organizer and two TA's).
So, we talked about it a lot after lecture and decided
on a strategy to present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 8th |
|
|
Contributed by: buddhika
Today we spent most of the day
discussing potential strategies. Essentially we wanted
to try and come up with all possible feasible strategies
so that we could pick one which might be likely to succeed
more often than not. We also attended Workshop 1 and
learnt about Lego assembly and bracing (something I
hadn't known about). We had to make a 4" cube which
could withstand a 5' drop. Our product survived the
first test drop but had minor failures in the following
tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 7th |
|
|
Contributed by:
buddhika
Today, we had our first lecture.
Sean and I arrived back in the US yesterday and while
he didn't have to deal too much with jet lag my sleep
cycle seems messed up. We learnt about this year's comeptition
and also received our robot kits. Some pretty cool stuff
in it. We had an assignment due tomorrow, so we went
ahead and completed the assignment back at Steven's
place. Also went to lab and got checked off. Feels like
this is gonna be one hectic month. Will discuss strategy
and pick one in the next few days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|